Costco is under legal fire from Lululemon Athletica, the high-end activewear brand, which alleges the warehouse giant is selling unauthorized copies of its signature apparel. The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, accuses Costco of violating Lululemon’s intellectual property by offering lookalike products under its in-house Kirkland Signature label.
Lululemon claims these items, including jackets, hoodies, and pants, copy its patented designs and distinctive aesthetic features. The disputed items allegedly mimic the Scuba hoodie, Define jacket, and ABC pants — three of Lululemon’s most recognizable products.
A Fight Against 'Dupe Culture'
The case is more than a corporate dispute — it’s a direct challenge to the growing “dupe culture” promoted by social media. Platforms like TikTok and Instagram have fueled consumer demand for affordable alternatives to high-end products. The term “dupe” has become shorthand for budget-friendly items that resemble designer or premium goods.
According to the complaint, Costco not only sold these lookalike items but continued to market them even after Lululemon sent a cease-and-desist letter in November 2024. Although Costco reportedly removed some products temporarily, Lululemon claims the retailer resumed sales of similar apparel shortly after, prompting the legal filing in June 2025.
Lululemon is seeking a jury trial, an injunction to stop further sales of the allegedly infringing items, and monetary damages. The exact amount sought has not been disclosed.
Market Impact and Brand Risk
From a market perspective, this case could have implications for both companies. While the lawsuit may not drastically affect Costco’s financials — given its scale and diverse revenue base — the reputational risk tied to intellectual property infringement could resonate more broadly. For Lululemon, the suit signals an effort to protect brand value in a retail landscape where authenticity is increasingly blurred.
Traders watching retail-sector CFDs may view this as a signal of volatility ahead. Legal uncertainty, especially around brand litigation, can influence short-term stock performance. At the time of writing, Costco’s share price sits at $984.80, showing marginal weakness. Lululemon’s shares, meanwhile, have risen slightly to $246.76, as the company projects strength in protecting its design assets.
A Pattern of IP Enforcement
This isn’t the first time Lululemon has taken legal action over design duplication. In 2021, it filed suit against Peloton for a similar issue involving workout apparel. That case was eventually settled, with the two companies entering a five-year co-branding agreement.
Analysts note that Lululemon’s aggressive defense of its intellectual property is part of a larger strategy to maintain pricing power in a crowded marketplace. With more retailers embracing private labels, the distinction between original and imitation products continues to blur — and enforcement may become more common.
Costco, for its part, has not yet responded publicly to the lawsuit and did not return requests for comment from multiple news outlets.
What Traders Should Watch
From a trading perspective, legal disputes such as this offer insight into brand strategy, pricing dynamics, and consumer sentiment. For those trading Costco or Lululemon through CFDs, the key risks typically involve public perception, court proceedings, and the potential for regulatory pressure on retailer branding.
Moreover, with growing scrutiny around product sourcing and marketing transparency, regulatory bodies could increase their oversight on “dupe” marketing — especially when it creates confusion among consumers.
If the case proceeds to trial, it could set a precedent for how courts interpret fashion design patents in a mass retail context. The outcome may influence how other high-end brands approach enforcement against big-box retailers or online platforms.
Capitalise on volatility in share markets
Take a position on moving share prices. Never miss an opportunity.
77% of retail CFD accounts lose money.
Conclusion
Lululemon’s lawsuit against Costco highlights a key battleground in modern retail: brand integrity versus accessibility. As social media continues to elevate affordable alternatives, high-end brands face the challenge of defending their value while appealing to wider audiences.
For traders and investors, the lawsuit is a reminder that legal strategy and brand control can move markets — even for companies as stable as Costco. Whether the courts side with Lululemon or dismiss the case, the implications for intellectual property enforcement in retail could be far-reaching.
